Why study the hard way when you can do it the smart way?

Online Legal Coach was built for law students preparing for their exams. Discuss your tutorial questions in our forum and have them answered by legal experts, and prepare for your exams with our study guides and videos on every law subject. 

Sign up for your free membership today!

As a member you get access to our study guides, student forum, form your online study groups and participate in contests. Get the head start in your law exams! Sign up now for free.

Paul v Constance (1976)

  [1977] 1 WLR 527 CA.

 

Facts:

 

Mr Constance separated from his wife. 2 years after the separation, Mr Constance and set up a home with his lover, Mrs. Paul and lived with her until his death. They shared their earnings and the household expenses. Mr. Constance received a sum of money as compensation for an industrial injury. He deposited the money into his bank account  ( under his sole name), but made it clear that both Mrs. Paul and himself are to use the money jointly. Mr Constance assured Mrs. Paul that `This money is as much yours as mine'.  When Mr. Constance died intestated , Mrs Paul claimed that he had created an express trust in her favour while Mr. Constance’s wife argued that the money belong to her husband’s estate which would automatically goes to her.

 

Held: (CA)

The Court of Appeal held that the word “this money is as much yours as mine” was sufficient to constitute a declaration of trust in favour of himself and Mrs. Paul. Although the word `trust' was never used, it was clear that Mr. Constance had intention to create such trust.